What an awkward group.
Nicole Richie, Selma Blair and Kim Kardashian all stripped down for an upcoming nude spread for Harper's Bazaar shot by photographer Amanda de Cadenet.
Though one celeb didn't strip down. Demi Moore decided to get behind the lens while the younger ladies bared it all.
Demi tweeted her excitement of getting behind the lens, saying:
"Helping my pal @amandadecadenet w/her photoshoot for Bazaar-all nudes showing all types of bodies love it! Especially cuz I'm behind camera!"
After the shoot, Nicole tweeted:
"Thank you @amandadecandenet & @mrskutcher for such a wonderful, inspiring day. It was an honor being nude for you."
No word on when the issue is coming out, but we're sure Kim will be pimping the shiz out of it because that's just the type of thing she'd do.
[Image via FayesVision/JCP/WENN.]
Guess having a bad hair day wasn't going to keep her from the red carpet this time.
Grandma Demi Moore wore a yawn inducing frock by Chanel while attending the premiere of son husband Ashton Kutcher's new flick Valentine's Day.
And from what we can tell, Demi wasn't thrilled either. Must have been past her bedtime.
By the way, Dem, are those wrinkles we see around your mouth and neck? Can't airbrush those out in real life, can you???
[Image via Apega/WENN.]
How very anti-Demi Moore of her!
New mom Kourtney Kardashian is lashing out against OK Magazine over their current cover story that features her, baby Mason and her so called post-baby diet secrets.
The only problem is she never spoke to OK for the cover story. Kourt says "They doctored and Photoshopped my body to make it look like I have already lost all the weight, which I have not."
She also tweeted "One of those weeklies got it wrong again…they didn’t have an exclusive with me. And I gained 40 pounds while pregs, not 26…But thanks!"
We like her honesty!
It's also said the OK constructed all of Kourtney's lower half since all over her original images were cropped at the belly.
Shady!
OK has yet to comment on the botched cover, but based on Kourtney's claim it's pretty obvious.
We can't wait for her to try and explain this one!
As you may recall, Demi "I'm Really This Flawless" Moore, claimed she wasn't airbrushed on that W magazine cover (which BTW the magazine has YET to comment). While that issue is yet to be settled, there's no way she can claim she wasn't photoshopped to hell in her Wanted ad campaign.
Her son husband Ashton Kutcher tweeted a photo of Demi while she was on set shooting for the ads and it's obvious that Mrs. Kutcher is not as perfect as she'd like the world to believe.
We aren't saying Demi doesn't look good for being 47, but it's kind of pointless to try and hide the obvious. All models and celebs are 'shopped in their ads, and while some are more altered than others, it's not a secret.
How many differences can U spot???
What will Demi Moore say about this!?
On the heels of firing off a letter to Anthony Citrano, asking the photographer to not only apologize, but retract statements he made about the actress' US cover (left) of W Magazine, the Korean version (right) of the mag has just hit the shelves.
And guess what??? Her hip has magically found its way back onto her body!
After seeing the newly edited cover, Anthony had this to say to everyone (especially Team Moore):
Right when you thought (hoped) this whole thing was over, something comes along that, as the Jerky Boys would say, puts a whole different paint job on things. I was back in Maine for Christmas (and of course, holding my breath for an apology and retraction from Demi Moore and her legal team), just hanging out with my Mom and her cat – and in came a cameraphone tip from halfway ’round the world. [Thanks, Joe!]
The January 2010 issue of W Korea just hit the newsstands (with the ironic subtitle “Women in Full”). Unsurprisingly, they decided to use the excellent Mert & Marcus shot of Demi Moore. But very surprisingly, they installed a new hip on Demi. So: even W’s sister publication thought the image looked weird enough to fix.
This raises a few serious questions for Martin Singer, his client, and W: did W’s Korean team add in a fake hip because they just kinda thought it looked awkward? (Y’know, like I did, before you attacked, discredited, and threatened to sue me?) Or did they merely reveal a hip that was already there, but that Singer, et alia litigiously denied had been accidentally obliterated?
If it’s the former: are Singer, Moore et alia now going to pursue legal action against W Korea? By retouching the image’s supposedly “genuine representation” of her “absolutely not retouched” hip, did W Korea imply the same things Singer claims I did (but which, of course, I didn’t)?
If it’s the latter: who was aware of this? If Mr. Singer and Ms. Moore were aware, this raises some rather serious legal questions. Regardless of it being the dumbest argument ever, some very serious core principles are in play.
Anyway, to my eyes, the W Korea image looks great – it’s a beautiful cover, and anatomically correct! If I’d seen this image in W’s December advance, I never would have said a thing – except, perhaps, “nice work!” (And, had I not been threatened with a lawsuit, I surely would never have noticed the deformed thumb.)
My attempts to secure comment from the W Korea editorial team were unsuccessful.
We're still on Team Citrano!
If it wasn't retouched to begin with, why would they go back and change it???
A word to W Magazine: NOW would be the time to end your silence and settle this once and for all!
Loading...
